ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
What makes theocracy dangerous? What -is- theocracy, truly?
The word translates as "Rule by God." This is a curious way for an atheist to refer to a religious government - what is a more accurate way of referring to a theocracy?
Well, there is a word. Pistocracy. "Rule by beliefs," or perhaps "Rule by believers." Epistocracy, "Rule by knowledge", or, as David Estlund translates, "Rule by the knowers", is just pistocracy in which the pistocrats assume they're correct.
Pistocracy, as a concept, is much more broadly applicable than theocracy; it is not limited to those governments run on beliefs written in ancient books. It describes any government which enforces a particular belief structure on its participants - these beliefs need not be religious. They can be philosophic - the belief that the community must come before the individual, for example.
The elements which make theocracy dangerous make a pistocracy dangerous as well - you do not need god to have heretics. Trotsky was a heretic of the Soviet pistocracy - an individual who shared the same basic beliefs but disagreed with the orthodox interpretation of those beliefs.
The danger in a pistocracy is -in- the orthodoxy, in established beliefs the challenging of which marks one as a heretic, an apostate, or a pagan. (We have a word for pagans even in science, which should be better than that - crank, or crackpot. "Denier" has become part of the parlance as well, at least in more politicized sciences.)
Beliefs aren't limited to beliefs about the world-as-it-is, either. Beliefs include the world-as-it-should-be. Every argument for free college education, for food stamps, for welfare in the general case - these are arguments for a pistocracy based around a set of beliefs about how the world operates, and how it should operate going forward. No concern or consideration is given for those whose beliefs differ - indeed, those who believe differently become The Enemy. Heartless, evil, cruel, selfish - whatever invectives can stick, to label the Unbeliever a heretic whose opinion is not worth hearing.
This is an elaborate work-up to a single point: A secular government isn't a free government. It can still fight and suppress philosophies, and indeed ours does so, on a scale that puts many theocracies to shame. We live under a government in which certain philosophies are, for all intents and purposes, illegal to practice. Not that I'm fond of racists, but the machinery that exists to crush them isn't limited in the scope of its application, and there has been a slow creep in that application, to the point where, today, the government attempts to crush even philosophies as basic as that it's better if workers manage their own health insurance, rather than relying on their employer to pick appropriate insurance programs -for- them.
The word translates as "Rule by God." This is a curious way for an atheist to refer to a religious government - what is a more accurate way of referring to a theocracy?
Well, there is a word. Pistocracy. "Rule by beliefs," or perhaps "Rule by believers." Epistocracy, "Rule by knowledge", or, as David Estlund translates, "Rule by the knowers", is just pistocracy in which the pistocrats assume they're correct.
Pistocracy, as a concept, is much more broadly applicable than theocracy; it is not limited to those governments run on beliefs written in ancient books. It describes any government which enforces a particular belief structure on its participants - these beliefs need not be religious. They can be philosophic - the belief that the community must come before the individual, for example.
The elements which make theocracy dangerous make a pistocracy dangerous as well - you do not need god to have heretics. Trotsky was a heretic of the Soviet pistocracy - an individual who shared the same basic beliefs but disagreed with the orthodox interpretation of those beliefs.
The danger in a pistocracy is -in- the orthodoxy, in established beliefs the challenging of which marks one as a heretic, an apostate, or a pagan. (We have a word for pagans even in science, which should be better than that - crank, or crackpot. "Denier" has become part of the parlance as well, at least in more politicized sciences.)
Beliefs aren't limited to beliefs about the world-as-it-is, either. Beliefs include the world-as-it-should-be. Every argument for free college education, for food stamps, for welfare in the general case - these are arguments for a pistocracy based around a set of beliefs about how the world operates, and how it should operate going forward. No concern or consideration is given for those whose beliefs differ - indeed, those who believe differently become The Enemy. Heartless, evil, cruel, selfish - whatever invectives can stick, to label the Unbeliever a heretic whose opinion is not worth hearing.
This is an elaborate work-up to a single point: A secular government isn't a free government. It can still fight and suppress philosophies, and indeed ours does so, on a scale that puts many theocracies to shame. We live under a government in which certain philosophies are, for all intents and purposes, illegal to practice. Not that I'm fond of racists, but the machinery that exists to crush them isn't limited in the scope of its application, and there has been a slow creep in that application, to the point where, today, the government attempts to crush even philosophies as basic as that it's better if workers manage their own health insurance, rather than relying on their employer to pick appropriate insurance programs -for- them.
Luxury Perfect Girls- Exclusive
This package is only suitable +18 for those who like to see Stunning Perfect Lux Girls / Women in the world + Busty Girls / Women⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
----------------------
Note* Requests for variations characters are also accepted so feel free to let me know!
$49/month
The Founder: My Expression Of Gratitude
I want to take a brief moment to thank all of the elected officials (the Presidents, Vice-Presidents, Senators, Congressmen/women, Judges, Lawyers, Secretaries,), and all of the Ambassadors, writers, editors, artist, and everyone else who had worked so hard over the years to make this experiment such a success.
We were the very first Forum-based Group, the largest, the longest lasting, and had the best political art on deviantART. Everyone who came after us modeled themselves after us.
I cannot thank everyone enough for all that they contributed.
Judge Roy Bean, Founder of the PoliticalForumClub
About Submissions
Dear DAPoliticalForumClub Members,
As you know, this group have submissions policy regarding deviations that get submitted here. I am going to post them here for future reference. This is to insure that, if you can't find the policy at Hansard-TheLaw, you can find them here:
Amendment III.. Respect Copyright.
Clause A. Do not copy and post entire copyrighted articles. If you wish to reference an article, provide a brief excerpt and include a link to the original source. Generally, excerpts should not exceed two or three paragraphs. This rule also applies to images in signature lines.
Clause B. Be aware, using someone else's artwork, even
Donald Trump, 45th POTUS!!
What does his inaugeration tomorrow mean to you? Do you bless and praise it, or curse and fear his taking the Oath of Office? Will you watch and cheer his taking the oath, or actively protest
Fidel Castro dead at 90.
The news out of Cuba is that Fidel Castro has died. Confirmed by his brother Raul, Castro's remains will be cremated.
His death marks the end of an era in many ways, and Fidel will remain a controversial figure for many years to come. Certainly, he is reviled by many in the Exile community. There is likely much celebrating in Miami and elsewhere. To many across Latin America and the developing world, he was a hero and icon of opposition to US Imperialism. He will be mourned wherever such persons are found.
That is all.
Featured in Groups
© 2014 - 2024 DAPoliticalForumClub
Comments1
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Oh that's nice. A new word.
But theocracy is more readily understood by most people.
But theocracy is more readily understood by most people.